I1 DISPLAY PRO VS DISPLAYCAL PLUS

The results are very repeatable, and all over the place.

And the different corrections don’t really agree with each other any better than just eyeballing the alignment. And depending on which one I choose I get different whites, different red primary chromaticity, and very different and very wrong gray tracking reports for factory mode Adobe RGB, like laughably bad 7–8 dE*00 hump in mid gray response. There are 5–10 different correction files for this device combo in database, all listed as ColorMunki / i1 Display Pro, with different Dell color mode assumptions (native, Adobe RGB, sRGB, etc). I’m starting with Displa圜al, and here the mystery deepens. This also lets me explore the no-cost Dell | XRite DUCCS capability to load display’s internal LUTs (“Cal1/2” modes)-Btw DUCCS appears to be rebranded i1 Profiler! The version on Dell’s website is old and has an expired Mac application certificate, but once installed, it downloads a newer version from XRite which seems up to date.

I1 DISPLAY PRO VS DISPLAYCAL PLUS

I’ve acquired a new i1 Display Pro Plus (XRite “EODIS3PL”) hoping to increase my confidence in measurement reports for Dell factory modes, and see how it differs from results of this 10 y.o. But… When examining the finer points I need to be able to triangulate. It makes alignments that look good, and track specs of the devices I’ve been measuring. It’s been a nagging question as to whether I can trust this DTP94 because of its age and changing display tech. To refresh I’ve been using a Monaco Optix XR DTP94 with i1 Pro ccmx this UP2516D display. I reported factory Adobe RGB tracking results for a UP2516D that meet Dell’s claims but were on edge of tolerance by Displa圜al standards. Hey this is a follow-up to thread about Dell UP2718Q.

I1 display pro vs displaycal